Search articles from thousands of Examiners
Write for us
Wilmington Politics Colorado Politics Examiner
Colorado Politics Examiner

Amendment 46

October 10, 5:37 PMColorado Politics ExaminerMatt Wolf
1 comment Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe


Get alerts when there is a new article from the Colorado Politics Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.
Email Address


  Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use


Ward Connerly

Amendment 46 is a measure sponsored by the Colorado Civil Rights Initiative, an organization run by Ward Connerly. The measure proposes to end all preferential treatment of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in public employment, public education (including college admission), and public contracting in the state of Colorado.

In opposition to the measure, Colorado Unity has argued that its wording and title are misleading and will lead to, "the end of even the most modest of equal opportunity and affirmative action programs in Colorado."

Governor Bill Ritter has also taken a stand against 46, stating that the amendment, "undercuts Colorado and destroys years of progress in education, in health care, in workforce development."

Opponents to the measure have also tried to attack the amendment in court, arguing that the signatures that placed it on the ballot in the first place were invalid and involved deceitful tactics. In a report by the Colorado Independent, former Pat Schroeder worker Venita Vinson and a woman named Candace Frie told tragic tales of being fooled by petition circulators outside of their local King Soopers. Frie even read the text of the initiative and still signed.

Timeout. If you are being fooled by petition circulators, then you are probably too stupid to be arguing anything in court. The challenge was thrown out.

Public opinion has swung violently against preferential treatment in recent years, and a poll back in June found that voters favor Amendment 46 by a margin of 65-15. Given this, opponents have apparently abandoned efforts to argue against the amendment on its merits, and instead have started airing attack ads targeting Connerly himself. Quick - which senility and paranoia-driven campaign for president do those tactics remind you of?

 

 

Comments

Name:


Comments:
characters left

NOTE: Do Not Alter These Fields:

Year in Review
What will you remember from 2009? See the Politics Year in Review.
Holiday Guide
Examiners spread the seasonal cheer with the Examiner.com Holiday Guide.

Recent Articles

Friday, January 30, 2009
State Rep. Claire Levy (D-Boulder) is currently seeking to close what is known as the "Wal-Mart Loophole" in the Colorado tax code. The …
Friday, January 23, 2009
I remember the day when I bought my first Silver Jews record like it was yesterday. I had stumbled across a review of their 1998 record, American …